Between 1998 and 2012 - Alfred Sant (the torch) | The Maltese Mazzun Blog
Alfred Sant in his article first two, for the first time makes public analiÿi events that occurred in the summer uruguay round of 1998 and comparing them with what is happening today, when gonzipn 'in crisis. Sant sees similarities, but also elicit differences that make two differing circumstances.
While ran the last episode in the saga policy which weave the Nationalist MP Franco Debono have been asked several times to comment. Rightly, the crisis has created Debono by "refusing" to renew its confidence to the government of Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi compared with the crisis in 1998 the Labour MP for the Labour government created Mintoff's 1996-1998. Until end of the last episode Debono, despite fażulli analyzes and meaningless comments uruguay round made by several parties about what happened in 1998, kept my silence, uruguay round prudence. Today perhaps good must break some. Never ħajritni the standpoint of jedha jmaxtar past. That was done - that happened happened, and the best always to remain forward looking. On the other hand, when you see who remains saint pretends uruguay round to continue to whitewash the hypocrisy and behavior unworthy of the past rhetoric tailored some "political persuasion", called: there recognizes you want your voice heard, as worded in English, for the-record. That's what I will do in the following. It would contrast the situation of the Labour government in 1998 with the state government of gonzi-pn today. As much as possible will keep the lens on political and structural factors. About motives and personal subterfuge burst their banks fourteen years ago, as is ibaqbqu today, will say at least. Perhaps write about it neither has passed more time, if managed it nikkalkola good will fall on me the sickle uruguay round of Death Ċensa. uruguay round
Any comparison must leave many elements, if not everyone, aware. From there, then come other elements that are different from how others viewed or less known. In this case, you must leave the political foundations of the two governments, that of the 1996-1998 uruguay round Labour uruguay round and Gonzi PN today, within the framework of parliamentary democracy of our country. After announcing the result of the election, the two governments were increasing deputies to cope majority in the Parliament. In the case of the Labour government, the absolute majority of votes obtained uruguay round in the election of 1996, justified a majority of three deputies in Parliament. The way designed to make electoral boundaries rather, has three seats less than the PN. But still there is no mechanism to adjust the number of deputies that the party has in Parliament in proportion to the percentage of votes obtained in the country. In the case of government-pn gonzi, the majority relative, not absolute, of votes obtained in the election of 2008 was overcome number of Labour votes less well than the average quota one election. In 1996, more parliamentary seats Opposition represented to the Labour government, a substantial reduction on the majority gained. In the case of gonzi-pn, more seats represents an advantage uruguay round that it does not actually underperformed the popular vote in 2008. The position departs from any government linked to the political program and its stated intentions. In the case of government-pn gonzi, after long years of Nationalist government, the program was one of continuity, which was linked to inspire confidence as a leader Dr Lawrence Gonzi. This iżżewwaq any promises designed to jgħammxu the voter, above all that of a significant reduction uruguay round in income tax.
The problem of lack of confidence in a set of old and ineffective ministers had to overcome with the promise that many of the ministers will be changed. But actually the best weapon of gonzi-pn was what I have called the power of incumbency. That unscrupulous use of all and the greatest engine power of the government before the election, to a b'maniġġi amusements, many of them exploitative, who hit satiety uruguay round government given "something" to tikkonslah or tirrikonċiljah him and again jivvotalu. In the election of 2008, helped many also the fact that to date, there is no control over who can vote from outside uruguay round the country, in violation of the Constitution. It tells you who to vote, must have lived for some time in Malta. Also helped that the polling remained open for longer than planned. When these maneuvers all successful, albeit żbrixx, the signal was given to the government seems to continue as before. With this difference: that the number of ministers has decreased, but the cabinet was formed by people who were all ministers 'old'. From here raised political tensions and parliamentary uruguay round recent years within the government of gonzi-pn. There were a significant number of the new backbencher ... pictured left ... and old discarded while "peers" remained ministers. As policy
Alfred Sant in his article first two, for the first time makes public analiÿi events that occurred in the summer uruguay round of 1998 and comparing them with what is happening today, when gonzipn 'in crisis. Sant sees similarities, but also elicit differences that make two differing circumstances.
While ran the last episode in the saga policy which weave the Nationalist MP Franco Debono have been asked several times to comment. Rightly, the crisis has created Debono by "refusing" to renew its confidence to the government of Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi compared with the crisis in 1998 the Labour MP for the Labour government created Mintoff's 1996-1998. Until end of the last episode Debono, despite fażulli analyzes and meaningless comments uruguay round made by several parties about what happened in 1998, kept my silence, uruguay round prudence. Today perhaps good must break some. Never ħajritni the standpoint of jedha jmaxtar past. That was done - that happened happened, and the best always to remain forward looking. On the other hand, when you see who remains saint pretends uruguay round to continue to whitewash the hypocrisy and behavior unworthy of the past rhetoric tailored some "political persuasion", called: there recognizes you want your voice heard, as worded in English, for the-record. That's what I will do in the following. It would contrast the situation of the Labour government in 1998 with the state government of gonzi-pn today. As much as possible will keep the lens on political and structural factors. About motives and personal subterfuge burst their banks fourteen years ago, as is ibaqbqu today, will say at least. Perhaps write about it neither has passed more time, if managed it nikkalkola good will fall on me the sickle uruguay round of Death Ċensa. uruguay round
Any comparison must leave many elements, if not everyone, aware. From there, then come other elements that are different from how others viewed or less known. In this case, you must leave the political foundations of the two governments, that of the 1996-1998 uruguay round Labour uruguay round and Gonzi PN today, within the framework of parliamentary democracy of our country. After announcing the result of the election, the two governments were increasing deputies to cope majority in the Parliament. In the case of the Labour government, the absolute majority of votes obtained uruguay round in the election of 1996, justified a majority of three deputies in Parliament. The way designed to make electoral boundaries rather, has three seats less than the PN. But still there is no mechanism to adjust the number of deputies that the party has in Parliament in proportion to the percentage of votes obtained in the country. In the case of government-pn gonzi, the majority relative, not absolute, of votes obtained in the election of 2008 was overcome number of Labour votes less well than the average quota one election. In 1996, more parliamentary seats Opposition represented to the Labour government, a substantial reduction on the majority gained. In the case of gonzi-pn, more seats represents an advantage uruguay round that it does not actually underperformed the popular vote in 2008. The position departs from any government linked to the political program and its stated intentions. In the case of government-pn gonzi, after long years of Nationalist government, the program was one of continuity, which was linked to inspire confidence as a leader Dr Lawrence Gonzi. This iżżewwaq any promises designed to jgħammxu the voter, above all that of a significant reduction uruguay round in income tax.
The problem of lack of confidence in a set of old and ineffective ministers had to overcome with the promise that many of the ministers will be changed. But actually the best weapon of gonzi-pn was what I have called the power of incumbency. That unscrupulous use of all and the greatest engine power of the government before the election, to a b'maniġġi amusements, many of them exploitative, who hit satiety uruguay round government given "something" to tikkonslah or tirrikonċiljah him and again jivvotalu. In the election of 2008, helped many also the fact that to date, there is no control over who can vote from outside uruguay round the country, in violation of the Constitution. It tells you who to vote, must have lived for some time in Malta. Also helped that the polling remained open for longer than planned. When these maneuvers all successful, albeit żbrixx, the signal was given to the government seems to continue as before. With this difference: that the number of ministers has decreased, but the cabinet was formed by people who were all ministers 'old'. From here raised political tensions and parliamentary uruguay round recent years within the government of gonzi-pn. There were a significant number of the new backbencher ... pictured left ... and old discarded while "peers" remained ministers. As policy
No comments:
Post a Comment