Deputy Prime Minister Olga Golodets:

Deputy Prime Minister Olga Golodets: "The number of failures veho of their children in our country is unprecedented in Europe." Why was once known chadolyubiem his country Russia became a European veho champion in the number of parental refusals of their own children?
Who should solve the problem of Russian orphans overseas or adoptive parents yet we do? Deputy Prime Minister for social affairs Olga Golodets politician able to see both sides of the coin. Olga Golodets opposed the ban on the adoption of Russian orphans in the United States. veho And, as a consequence of her interview with "MK", it remains veho confident in its correctness. But the words of the Deputy Prime Minister should be both. In the current problems of our orphans to blame not only the power. Wines of ordinary citizens at least, no less. Olga, what would happen if the United States did not accept veho the "law Magnitsky": orphans and remained for the Russian state "priority number 101?" Your question is a question of provocation. But I welcome any debate in society on child abandonment in Russia even the most ardent and provocative. I am convinced that such disputes are extremely useful for both the state and society. What exactly do I mean? For example, the first meeting of the new Council of the Government of the Russian Federation on the guardianship of the social sphere held in October last year, and it is discussed in the abandonment issues: family children's homes and other new forms of content children. I repeat once again: it was before the adoption of the said law. But our voice sounded very particularly it is today. Society has an emotional meltdown. Discussion on orphan came to an entirely different level. They have joined a lot of new people. And it gives me an extra reason to hope that we will cope with the task to adopt a year in the country for at least 30tysyach veho orphaned more than before. Understand whether in our power structures: endorsing a ban on adoption of Russian orphans in the United States, the political leadership to assume the exclusive heavy burden of responsibility? I understand what you are saying. Personally, I feel responsible for all Russian veho orphans: those who had been referred veho for adoption in other countries, and those who remained in the country. But his right to say just about the responsibility of the state? It seems to me that is no less important topic public responsibility. Problem unhappy childhood in Russia is much more than just a problem of orphans. For example, we know that children in a car accident in Russia killed far more than in most developed countries. We also have an unprecedented number of failures for Europe from their children. Think about it: with living parents children live in orphanages and boarding schools. Their parents or are in prison, either because of alcoholism and drug addiction are not engaged in their children. Society should be no tolerance for such behaviors, they are absolutely anti-human. If you do not change the society itself, then we can never achieve anything. I totally agree. But let's talk about the responsibility of the state. Exactly how it intends to address the problem of orphans? The government has approved a number of draft laws that will soon be submitted to the State Duma. Last year in Russia in adoption and guardianship needed 128tysyach children. Of this number, 69tysyach children during the year were placed in families. A need to increase the number of children who are held in the family, at least 30tysyach. How we intend to achieve it? Most often, the desire to adopt children in orphanages, express their relatives: grandparents, brothers and sisters. But before there were rules that it actually prevented. For example, even if the older brother veho came of age between him and the child was required to exist difference in the age at 16 years, and only in exceptional cases, the court could not go forward. Now mandatory no difference, this question is left solely to the court. Change, we also offer a list of diseases that are contraindicated for adoption. We believe, for example, that this list should be excluded oncology first and second stage when it is to treat, of course. Medicine over the past decade still went ahead. Cured from diseases veho such people can without too much trouble to look after children. And will not it, that in order to achieve the promised number of adoptions of children will be given in advance unsuitable hands? There are new rules which not only do not diminish but, on the contrary, increase the responsibility of the host country. Previously, for example, was not the norm of mental disorder. Now any mental disorder obstacle to adoption of a child. We do not want to weaken the control and save people from unnecessary bureaucratic procedures. It is no secret that used to be curious cases: if a person gets the last necessary for adoption certificate, the validity of the first has expired. Now the validity veho of such certificates increased. Anekotorye certificate veho recognized unnecessary and off. Another common situation in life. If there happens to n