TørklædeXperimentet - Avisen.dk
Write your own blog
First name is required. Last name is required. Email is required. Email must be filled in both fields. Error comparison of email. The email address ctpat is not valid. ctpat Your e-mail provider is not supported. A user with the email entered already exists. Sign up!
TørklædeXperimentet
I was invited to debate with the chairwoman of Critical Muslims, Sherin Khankan ctpat on broadcast row TørklædeXperimentet and my letter to the editor in Berlingeren the 7.1. You can then go to the link and hear the broadcast, but my blog is all about the message I want to debate. Sherin Khankan, Samilla Quereshi and all the other well educated, talented and young believers Muslim women have chosen the scarf while make the point that they are not suppressed. No, that experience, I do not think they are. They also take away from forced tilhylning of female children, and they have very different in imams announcement that women without a headscarf should not be respected. Should ctpat we, the critical ever convinced that the scarf can symbolize nothing but oppression, then, these self-conscious Muslim women on the field. They must be on television into a confrontation with the imams, where they very clearly ctpat and unequivocally tell the imams that they denounce scarf compulsion that they denounce violations of girls and women that they denounce forced marriage and in general denounces interpretations of sharia, not equate women with men. I was told that Critical Muslims have these discussions in a closed forum, but let me hear and experience them, and let me hear imams reaction. Had imams denounce your views on equality, then you have a gender battle ahead of you. Should I go in demonstration against the cultural and religious oppression of women, then I go with. Will you then still have Your scarf on, then it could perhaps have given a new meaning, or perhaps did it so I did not. Practising Muslim women have a big mission ahead of you. Filed in the chairperson's Blog ->
It suppresses the weakest, namely women and children, and I believe that it is only to make democracy stronger and prevent gender equality both between rich and poor but also between women and men.
Posts | 14 | 27,522 | 245
I do not understand. ctpat Why should people on to say quite normal and ordinary things? And the media would make them talk? For example, I am against child pornography, animal testing, ctpat pollution, war, domestic violence, etc. However, I am for peace, freedom, clean environment, tailwind ctpat on bike paths and more sunshine in Denmark. Who would touch my debates with the message?
PS Why should the burden of proving that I am a normal, everyday person lie with me? Is it not the same as saying "You are extremist / agree with weird Imams / oppressed / etc. Until proven guilty"? Strange. Personally, I have better ctpat things to spend my time than to convince the "critical" that I'm good enough.
@ SarahA: Yes, it is as if the attitude is that no one in their right mind would choose to cover themselves. , I thought always that the right to choose her own clothes covered more than choosing ctpat clothes OFF.
What does "Women for Freedom" ctpat and Karen West going to do about the lack of freedom and equality that exists in the state church, where some male priests will not shake hands with females being koleger. Male priests ctpat may also find that everything female priests ctpat have touched, shall be washed with alcohol. Moreover, the number ag female priests who have reached to become dean or bishop is not in accordance with the similarity that Karen West advocates. WHAT HAVE KAREN WEST WOMEN OF FREEDOM done in this case.
When millions of women around the world are being forced to wrap herself in, and that in those countries openly and without beating around the bush is in line with the oppression of women, so I marvel that even conscious practicing Muslim women in this country called scarf choice for freedom and independence. No matter what interpretation of the prophets writings trades scarf on the woman must hide from men's eyes, otherwise they are to blame for men's abuse. So therefore I can not understand that here in DK also need to wrap herself into. There are as few men in this country who is tampering with women. Role models and opinion among these confident women form præsedens for many of your "sisters". We know all know that there is massive discrimination against girls and boys in too many families where culture and religion ctpat have not kept up with demok
Write your own blog
First name is required. Last name is required. Email is required. Email must be filled in both fields. Error comparison of email. The email address ctpat is not valid. ctpat Your e-mail provider is not supported. A user with the email entered already exists. Sign up!
TørklædeXperimentet
I was invited to debate with the chairwoman of Critical Muslims, Sherin Khankan ctpat on broadcast row TørklædeXperimentet and my letter to the editor in Berlingeren the 7.1. You can then go to the link and hear the broadcast, but my blog is all about the message I want to debate. Sherin Khankan, Samilla Quereshi and all the other well educated, talented and young believers Muslim women have chosen the scarf while make the point that they are not suppressed. No, that experience, I do not think they are. They also take away from forced tilhylning of female children, and they have very different in imams announcement that women without a headscarf should not be respected. Should ctpat we, the critical ever convinced that the scarf can symbolize nothing but oppression, then, these self-conscious Muslim women on the field. They must be on television into a confrontation with the imams, where they very clearly ctpat and unequivocally tell the imams that they denounce scarf compulsion that they denounce violations of girls and women that they denounce forced marriage and in general denounces interpretations of sharia, not equate women with men. I was told that Critical Muslims have these discussions in a closed forum, but let me hear and experience them, and let me hear imams reaction. Had imams denounce your views on equality, then you have a gender battle ahead of you. Should I go in demonstration against the cultural and religious oppression of women, then I go with. Will you then still have Your scarf on, then it could perhaps have given a new meaning, or perhaps did it so I did not. Practising Muslim women have a big mission ahead of you. Filed in the chairperson's Blog ->
It suppresses the weakest, namely women and children, and I believe that it is only to make democracy stronger and prevent gender equality both between rich and poor but also between women and men.
Posts | 14 | 27,522 | 245
I do not understand. ctpat Why should people on to say quite normal and ordinary things? And the media would make them talk? For example, I am against child pornography, animal testing, ctpat pollution, war, domestic violence, etc. However, I am for peace, freedom, clean environment, tailwind ctpat on bike paths and more sunshine in Denmark. Who would touch my debates with the message?
PS Why should the burden of proving that I am a normal, everyday person lie with me? Is it not the same as saying "You are extremist / agree with weird Imams / oppressed / etc. Until proven guilty"? Strange. Personally, I have better ctpat things to spend my time than to convince the "critical" that I'm good enough.
@ SarahA: Yes, it is as if the attitude is that no one in their right mind would choose to cover themselves. , I thought always that the right to choose her own clothes covered more than choosing ctpat clothes OFF.
What does "Women for Freedom" ctpat and Karen West going to do about the lack of freedom and equality that exists in the state church, where some male priests will not shake hands with females being koleger. Male priests ctpat may also find that everything female priests ctpat have touched, shall be washed with alcohol. Moreover, the number ag female priests who have reached to become dean or bishop is not in accordance with the similarity that Karen West advocates. WHAT HAVE KAREN WEST WOMEN OF FREEDOM done in this case.
When millions of women around the world are being forced to wrap herself in, and that in those countries openly and without beating around the bush is in line with the oppression of women, so I marvel that even conscious practicing Muslim women in this country called scarf choice for freedom and independence. No matter what interpretation of the prophets writings trades scarf on the woman must hide from men's eyes, otherwise they are to blame for men's abuse. So therefore I can not understand that here in DK also need to wrap herself into. There are as few men in this country who is tampering with women. Role models and opinion among these confident women form præsedens for many of your "sisters". We know all know that there is massive discrimination against girls and boys in too many families where culture and religion ctpat have not kept up with demok
No comments:
Post a Comment